Which case law says you can't shoot a fleeing suspect?

Which case law says you can't shoot a fleeing suspect?

• A. Tennessee v. Garner
• B. Graham v. Connor
• C. Miranda v. Arizona
• D. Mapp v. Ohio

Answer: (A)

This question targets the rule about when deadly force can be used against a fleeing suspect under the Fourth Amendment. Tennessee v. Garner holds that law enforcement cannot shoot a fleeing suspect to prevent escape unless the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious bodily harm to the officer or others, or there’s an imminent risk that letting the suspect escape would create greater danger. In short, you can’t shoot someone just to stop them from running away; deadly force is limited to situations where there’s a real threat. This is the best answer because it directly establishes the constitutional limit on using deadly force against fleeing suspects, rather than addressing other policing issues. The other cases deal with different topics: Graham v. Connor sets the general objective reasonableness standard for use of force, Miranda v. Arizona concerns interrogation rights, and Mapp v. Ohio deals with the exclusionary rule for illegally obtained evidence.

This question targets the rule about when deadly force can be used against a fleeing suspect under the Fourth Amendment. Tennessee v. Garner holds that law enforcement cannot shoot a fleeing suspect to prevent escape unless the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious bodily harm to the officer or others, or there’s an imminent risk that letting the suspect escape would create greater danger. In short, you can’t shoot someone just to stop them from running away; deadly force is limited to situations where there’s a real threat.

This is the best answer because it directly establishes the constitutional limit on using deadly force against fleeing suspects, rather than addressing other policing issues. The other cases deal with different topics: Graham v. Connor sets the general objective reasonableness standard for use of force, Miranda v. Arizona concerns interrogation rights, and Mapp v. Ohio deals with the exclusionary rule for illegally obtained evidence.